tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4821574965866189742.post6103903617796138845..comments2023-05-28T10:41:19.404+01:00Comments on Notes from a Potting Shedder: JUST STOP!! THE McCANN CHARADE - REOPEN OR REVIEW?Me, Myself, Moi...http://www.blogger.com/profile/08528066550134461649noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4821574965866189742.post-92074920991085434002010-11-10T13:38:35.806+00:002010-11-10T13:38:35.806+00:00Absolutely spot on!Absolutely spot on!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4821574965866189742.post-38257506967713619852010-11-03T22:28:15.372+00:002010-11-03T22:28:15.372+00:00Answering the 48 is obsolete by now. But the recon...Answering the 48 is obsolete by now. But the reconstruction could be done. Accepting their conditions of having cameras filming, accepting actors as well if they admitted sticking to their statements...<br />If I had any authority, I would recommend filming with just that requirement. We would see curtains suddenly flying and getting back behind bed and chair, we would see shutters lifted from outside and falling down and partly breaking, we would wonder why the abductor closed the patio doors behind him, etc. <br />So they would most probably be relieved when told that broadcasting such a reconstruction could be a bad idea.Annenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4821574965866189742.post-47286221202991648512010-11-03T22:00:22.906+00:002010-11-03T22:00:22.906+00:00@Anne .
Not sure if you've read the statements...@Anne .<br />Not sure if you've read the statements from the released files but they are so contradictory that a reconstruction would be like a carry on film .<br /><br />NEW evidence can be got during a reconstruction by observing something they said didn't happen as well as by something they said did .It all has to fit into a time slot .<br /><br />So it's safe to say that new evidence would be found by doing a reconstruction ,because they all can't be telling the truth if they contradict each other and the official released statements prove they did .<br />Looking on the bright side .If Kate went back and answered the 48 questions and told the truth, any evidence gleaned from her answers could exonerate her and finally she could claim honestly to be ''totally innocent'' ...or not !!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4821574965866189742.post-34301119071170847482010-11-03T19:25:16.183+00:002010-11-03T19:25:16.183+00:00Are you sure, MMM, that agreeing with a reconstruc...Are you sure, MMM, that agreeing with a reconstruction and answering the 48 would be enough ? There was a deadline for the case not to be shelved. Now, apart from changing their behaviour, they should offer some kind of new evidence (imo).Annenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4821574965866189742.post-34047545977549283892010-11-03T13:59:46.188+00:002010-11-03T13:59:46.188+00:00brilliant and i second the above,send it to teresa...brilliant and i second the above,send it to teresa may and any other m p.s and newspapers<br />the mccanns are fraudsters and should not be treated like mini celebs.<br />chrisAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4821574965866189742.post-16829139916501557652010-11-03T10:32:01.382+00:002010-11-03T10:32:01.382+00:00This should appear in every British National Daily...This should appear in every British National Daily....sadly, there are people at the very top making sure nothing like that will ever happen.<br />WHY??Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com